Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the 2018 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. We searched three databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL, for 2010-2023. The titles and abstracts were searched using the following keywords: Drug, alcohol, and substance use/abuse/misuse, behavioral health, methamphetamine, marijuana, cocaine, heroin, ecstasy, hallucinogens, inhalants, prescription drugs, opioid, meth, addiction, and Hawaii/Hawaiʻi. We also identified government and other reports through a manual search. The exclusion criteria include the absence of a substance use focus, policies/reviews/brochures/newsletters/reviews/historical/pharmacological documents, unable to access full-text articles, and conducted outside of the U.S.
Results: The database and a manual search yielded 688 and 13 documents, respectively. After removing duplicates and excluding documents based on exclusion criteria, 21 documents were included in our final synthesis. Our synthesis generated four categories: geography/location, age/age range, race/ethnicity, and vulnerable populations. Most documents included state and county-level data. Eighteen documents reported data on individuals under or over the age of 18. Thirteen documents reported data on Native Hawaiians, followed by Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Samoan, and Other Pacific Islanders. Filipino and Japanese were the most reported Asian categories. Most documents included White as a category, seven included Black or African American, and two included American Indian/Alaska Native. Some documents included categories such as Portuguese, Hispanic, Latino, Spanish, and mixed races/ethnicities. Vulnerable populations found in the review include sexual gender minorities, pregnant/parenting women, homeless, justice system-involved individuals, and victims of sexual and intimate partner violence.
Conclusions and Implications: Our findings show that comprehensive literature reports data at the state level, diverse race/ethnic groups, and youth groups under 18. There needs to be more literature and data on substance use in community-level geography and among the aging population. Future research that focuses on community-level geography data and the aging population may fill gaps in the literature. It will allow professionals and community members to build on existing strengths and identify specific needs and resources. It would also allow for tailored and culturally appropriate substance use prevention, treatment, and recovery services.