Abstract: Venues and Geosocial Networking Apps: What Is the Relationship between in-Person Versus Digital Gay Community Involvement and Risk for Young Sexual Minority Men? (Society for Social Work and Research 23rd Annual Conference - Ending Gender Based, Family and Community Violence)

281P Venues and Geosocial Networking Apps: What Is the Relationship between in-Person Versus Digital Gay Community Involvement and Risk for Young Sexual Minority Men?

Schedule:
Friday, January 18, 2019
Continental Parlors 1-3, Ballroom Level (Hilton San Francisco)
* noted as presenting author
Jeremy Gibbs, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
John Senese, MSW, Project Specialist, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Jeremy Goldbach, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Background and Purpose: Geosocial networking apps (GSNA) enabled young sexual minority men (YSMM; e.g., gay, bisexual pansexual) to connect with geographically proximal men. Recent literature reports that GSNA use is associated with higher rates of substance use and sexual risk in YSMM. However, these studies use samples recruited from gay venues (e.g., bars, clubs), which means study participants both use GSNA and attend gay venues. YSMM who exclusively use GSNA are systematically excluded from these studies, potentially biasing the findings that GSNA use is associated with risk. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate how attending venues and using GSNA impact the substance use and sexual risk of sample of YSMM recruited form both venues and a GSNA.

Methods: In 2017 and 2018, 116 YSMM (18-24-year-olds) were recruited in Los Angeles, CA to participate in an online study. Sixty-eight participants were recruited using venue-based probability sampling 48 using GSNA-based probability sampling. Men were stratified and compared as four groups (i.e., only GSNA user, only venue user, venues and GSNA user, and use neither). These groups were compared using chi square analysis for difference in substance use (lifetime use and last 30 use) and sexual risk (i.e., ever having an HIV test, unprotected sex at last sexual encounter, and substance use at last sexual encounter).

Results: The sample was 46% only GSNA user, 8% only venue user, 34% GSNA and venue user, and 11% using neither. Results indicate that venue and GSNA users report higher rates of lifetime drug use, and recent alcohol, hard drug, and prescription drug misuse compared to users of only GSNA. There were no significant differences in sexual risk between the four groups.

Conclusions and Implications: GSNA may not increase risk for YSMM. Instead, users of traditional gay venues and GSNA represent the highest risk profile for substance use. GSNA may provide social opportunities outside of a venue contexts where substances are more readily used. As the YSMM community is becoming increasingly digital, research should prioritize the use of recruitment methodologies that include YSMM who only use GSNA.